Retired-perspective: what survives of the federal merit system after 30 years

Spent 30 years in federal hiring, retired last year. A few things I'd want a younger version of myself to know. (1) The merit system never really existed as a coherent system; it was a patchwork of competing rule-sets each meant to fix the failures of the previous one. (2) The most defensible hiring decisions I made were the ones I documented before knowing the outcome. (3) The most regrettable were the ones where I followed a checklist someone else built. The Risk Efficacy framing would have changed how I documented #2 and given me cover to refuse #3. Better late than never.

3 replies

Helen — your point #2 is the single most underrated principle in hiring. Pre-registering your reasoning before knowing the outcome is the closest thing to an honest evaluation we have. Wish more managers understood it.

If you'd be willing to write some of this up as a longer reflection I'd love to circulate it. The institutional memory in your post is the part that doesn't make it into the GAO reports.

Echoing Elena. There's an entire generation of hiring folks aging out and the lessons are walking out the door with them.

Sign in to join the community and add a reply.