Anyone applying these frameworks to creative or artistic decision-making?

A close friend runs an MFA program and we've talked about this. The Calibration pillar maps almost directly onto what she calls "taste reliability" — knowing when your draft is actually good versus when you're just attached to it.

I think it survives translation but the measurement infrastructure doesn't. Self-report is even less reliable in creative contexts than it is in analytical ones. The pillars are useful as a vocabulary, less useful as a scoring rubric.

The Outcome Achievement pillar is the awkward one in creative work because there isn't a clean ground truth. "Did the audience like it?" is a noisy proxy. Worth thinking about whether process quality can be the primary measurement and outcome second.